Drip Drip Drip by Arletta
Drip Drip Drip Etched by Arletta
Comments
- Carlos Teófiloover 3 years agoWonderful work.
- Thank you, muchly!– Arletta
- Belinda "Billy...over 3 years agoI like it. Billy. Would be a wonderful print but would take weeks to make.
- I don’t know how to make prints, really. I am getting that wild feeling of needing to paint and/or otherwise create something “real” though. Oh yes, I am.We have a wonderful Print Makers Group that does shows around here, from time to time. I think they have more discipline than I can manage .. or at least than I can get from pets and children lol– Arletta
- Susan Epps Oliverover 3 years agoNice texture here……this is my second favourite……..Drip, Drip, Drip is my first :)
Drip Drip Drip Etched II by Arletta
Comments
- Antanasover 3 years agofantastic colors
- Thank you. I think I couldn’t take it in a large dose (print) but it would be good for small prints, cards, etc. Of course, when I say large, I am thinking in feet, as I like very large prints. The large one on this site would be fine.– Arletta
Drip Drip Drip Drawn by Arletta
Comments
- Belinda "Billy...over 3 years agoI like this one also, I think Ilike this one the best. Yes, I do.
- I think, sometimes, so do I .. it’s the bottom, where the flowers are more defined, more real looking. But, then, I think ‘Drip Drip Drip’ has more of a watery feel to it.Thank you!– Arletta
- Belinda "Billy...over 3 years agoI guess the bottom is bolder and more defined, the colours stronger and the back ground has distance..I love it. Billy
- You can analyze people by what they prefer in art. You can, but I don’t recommend it. Often what is blatantly obvious to an art critique is not what the actual appeal is to another. Like, they might say the changing shifts of color and hue are indicitave of … and meanwhile the “regular” viewer is going “Wow! So many round things!” Therefore, until people tell you they really love round things, or it reminds them of the dog that bit them when they were 12, for instance, there isn’t as much to go on as one might think.Which I say, as I could read a lot into what you just said about definition and distance and strength, etc. .. but then this would be a psychologist site, and who wants that?I think I prefer the other one because the background doesn’t have so much distance, so it’s more like a wee little cocoon sort of clearing in the woods, but still very much IN the woods. I wonder what Freud would have said to that? lol– Arletta
Comments